“Sci-Hub Founder: Academic Publishers Are the Real Threat to Science, Not Sci-Hub.” Hard to argue against that. Monopolistic publishers burn science funding, waste time, provide bad service and block innovation.
I made a chrome extension to add scihub links directly to various publisher websites
Social Science researchers move Delhi High Court to protect LibGen & SciHub
why sci-hub is important, you ask?
Hi all, I’m currently working on an assignment and need to use scihub however, the domain I have been using no longer works. So I came to the master post on this sub to try all other domains and none of them work, even on other internet browsers 🙁 It’s been a few days now… Continue reading All link domains no longer work
#ArXiv celebration: Two million articles and counting!
from the 2022-begins dept This week, both our winners on the insightful side come in response to our post about Eric Clapton pretending to regret his lawsuit against a random woman in Germany who listed a bootleg CD on eBay. As it happens, the first place winner is a reply to the second place winner,… Continue reading Funniest/Most Insightful Comments Of The Week At Techdirt
Correct me if I am wrong and the money, in **fact**, goes to some undeserving third-party. But who will choose to write a book or conduct a study without monetary gain? Few. Edit: I see. So who pays scientists and what are the consequences of all science being free – for science? Also by monetary… Continue reading If science is free by default, what will be the motivation for scientists to produce more of it?
Sci-Hub: is it Unethical to “Pirate” Science? (Video and transcript by scientific skeptic Rebecca Watson.) “The oligarchy these publishers have formed is immoral and antithetical to the pursuit of humanity’s knowledge”
Please provide me this research paper https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/9651337/